Vilnius beyond Urban vs Non-Urban Opposition: A Few Entry Points to the Planetary Urban Futures

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51740/RT.3.23.24.10

Keywords:

planetarity , urban nature , Umwelt , urban ecosystem , Vilnius , the Karoliniškės Landscape Reserve, more-than-urban heritage, non-human-centered public space , green commodification frontier

Abstract

The article analyzes Vilnius urban forest by applying the notion of planetarity and considering its implications for urban research. The author’s argument is delivered in three parts. The first part scrutinizes the difference between globalization and planetarity in a long-term perspective of social urban scholarship. The second part examines the significance of the vast amount of forest in Vilnius, as well as its lineage in the context of post-WWII urban growth. The third part regards the Karoliniškės Landscape Reserve as part of Vilnius green belt and as a potential opening in place of a former boundary, compatible with the earlier modern urban growth civic projects meant to replace the medieval city walls as “isolation belts.” Finally, the author discusses the Reserve’s three dimensions in the course of such opening—as more-than-urban heritage, non-human-centered public space, and a potential green commodification frontier.

Downloads

Published

29/12/2023

How to Cite

Liubimau, S. (2023). Vilnius beyond Urban vs Non-Urban Opposition: A Few Entry Points to the Planetary Urban Futures. Relevant Tomorrow, 3(23–24), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.51740/RT.3.23.24.10